On 1/17/12 4:36 PM, Sam Silvester wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Brian Haberman > <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: >> >> I am not sure there is a benefit to adding a single adjective to the noted >> sentence. The actual reference is correct, so the reader will be correctly >> directed to the Lightweight MLD specification. >> >> Regards, >> Brian > > Fair enough. > > My understanding was that "Lightweight MLDv2" is the name of the RFC > in the reference, as such shouldn't we be getting it right - > especially in the sense that the name is close enough to MLDv2 and > therefore avoiding confusion would be a good thing? i.e. it's less an > adjective - if we're referring to an RFC, we should do it properly - > especially when there is another, similar and related RFC that is also > being discussed in the same paragraph? > > If only because it made me stop, get a little confused and have to go > back and re-read the section (hence the Errata!) to get it clear in my > mind what was going on.
I parsed the sentence differently. I interpreted it as "implement MLDv2 using the guidance provided in RFC...". In other words, I did not interpret "MLDv2" as the title of the referenced RFC. I am curious as to what others think about this. Regards, Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
