Hi, I've only seen one comment on this question. Any more, or should the authors just decide?
Regards Brian Carpenter On 2012-01-04 15:23, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource Identifiers > > We'd like feedback on this. In particular, which of the two options > proposed do people prefer? > > OPTION 1: > > The existing syntax of IPv6address is extended by adding a specific > option for the case of link-local addresses. > > OPTION 2: > > The existing syntax of IPv6address is retained, and a zone identifier > may be added optionally to any literal address. This allows > flexibility for unknown future uses. > > - Brian & Bob > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:27:00 -0800 > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Reply-To: internet-dra...@ietf.org > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform > Resource Identifiers > Author(s) : Brian Carpenter > Robert M. Hinden > Filename : draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2011-12-06 > > This document describes how the Zone Identifier of an IPv6 scoped > address can be represented in a Uniform Resource Identifier that > includes a literal IPv6 address. It updates RFC 3986 and RFC 4007. > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
