----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; "t.petch" <ie...@btconnect.com>; "6man" <ipv6@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:41 PM
> Hi Juergen, > > On 2012-02-08 20:17, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:53:10AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > >> I don't see any particular value in limiting the ZoneID string to 15. > > > > Good. > > > >> Reserved characters can always be % escaped; that's not an issue, > >> but should be mentioned in the text. > > > > The text currently says > > > > ZoneID = 1*15unreserved > > > > and my understanding of unreserved is that it does not allow % > > escaping. So the ZoneID production should likely be changed to > > something like this: > > > > ZoneID = *( unreserved / pct-encoded ) > > Well, I'd like a URI guru to confirm that, but it makes sense, > except that it needs to be 1* since a null string isn't useful. Since this is an update to RFC3986, I think that, once this list has come to a consensus, then the I-D should be mentioned on the URI list, u...@w3.org (being non-IETF, this list can be a bit of a pain to use). Note that this is not the uri-review list, which is for new schemes, which this is not. Tom Petch > The new draft has ZoneID = 1*unreserved but that's easy to fix. > > Thanks > Brian > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
