I prefer A. (public address is to be preferred) Whatever the final choice will be, I would like 3484bis to allow the policy setting to be reversed.
BTW, my choice is based on: - privacy is anyway given away with cookies, HTTP headers such as User-Agent string - stable address is key for audit-trail (so Fernando's proposal is useful here) > -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Brian Haberman > Sent: mardi 27 mars 2012 09:34 > To: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: 3484bis and privacy addresses > > All, > The chairs would like to get a sense of the working group on changing > the current (defined 3484) model of preferring public addresses over privacy > addresses during the address selection process. RFC 3484 prefers public > addresses with the ability (MAY) of an implementation to reverse the > preference. The suggestion has been made to reverse that preference in > 3484bis (prefer privacy addresses over public ones). > Regardless, the document will allow implementers/users to reverse the > default preference. > > Please state your preference for one of the following default options > : > > A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses > > B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses > > Regards, > Brian, Bob, & Ole > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
