+1 for option A Carl Wuyts GCD System Architect Networking CONNECT DIVISION carl.wu...@technicolor.com tel.: +32 3 443 65 90
Prins Boudewijnlaan 47 - 2650 Edegem - Belgium Technicolor Delivery Technologies Belgium NV Registered office (maatschappelijke zetel): Prins Boudewijnlaan 47, 2650 Edegem, Belgium Company registration number (ondernemingsnummer): 0428837295 - RPR Antwerpen Help preserve the color of our world - Think before you print. -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francis Dupont Sent: dinsdag 27 maart 2012 10:15 To: Brian Haberman Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses In your previous mail you wrote: > A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses > > B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses => I voted A but I have no strong opinion (I think the privacy addresses is a silly response to a silly concern. BTW as using the Free ISP 6rd I get a fixed /64 prefix with my fixed IPv4 address embedded in it, so privacy addresses can only bring trouble to me :-). My question is different and more for you as an IAB member: is this a chance to get the address selection document (currently RFC 3484) downgraded as a BCP (from its current standard track) so it will take less years to be updated the next time? Note it was known from beginning the RFC 3484 should have never been in the standard track, and it was obsolete as soon as being published... Thanks francis.dup...@fdupont.fr -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
