That's exactly what I've meant in the first place - looking for a place for citations, the IANA protocol numbers site would have been the first place where I would look for such information.
Greetings, Stefan ________________________________________ Von: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] im Auftrag von Jeroen Massar [jer...@unfix.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 18:00 An: Brian E Carpenter Cc: Duncan, Jeremy; 'ipv6@ietf.org' Betreff: Re: Is there an official Extension Headers List? On 2012-05-22 17:46 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > However, extension headers defined since 2460 have to be added. > That's the case for MIPv6, SHIM6 and HIP. > > This matters - there are known to be boxes that discard packets > with a SHIM6 header, for example. > > We do maybe need a little normative RFC on this. Isn't the proper location for this: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xml Though that just points to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xml as those are all the protocol numbers. The "problem" with that list is that it is not noted explicitly as being a Extension Header, thus IMHO it would be best if IANA could add a flag or so to indicate that a certain protocol number is explicitly used as a IPv6 Extension Header. Greets, Jeroen -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------