After the errata was posted, there was a short discussion on 6man about this and comments were made that lower case was a WG decision and it stands. My apologies for forgetting to update the status.
Regards, Seiichi (2012/05/30 9:37), Randy Bush wrote: >> Next thing you know, I'm going along based on this recollection, I >> look up RFC 5952, and I notice there's now an "errata" associated with >> it. Would that errata be about some grammatical minutiae? Nope. It's >> specifically to switch back to upper case hex representation! > > there is a lesson here > > randy > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
