> Obviously. An erratum that attempts to reverse a clear WG consensus > that the person doesn't like is a misuse of the errata system.
that is not exactly what occurred. and blame is not very interesting anyway. i have asked the rfced if they can do a derattum. others migh support this if it is questioned. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
