Hi, all,

We have submitted a new draft draft-jiang-semantic-prefix, "Semantic IPv6 
Prefix". It proposes a framework to allow semantics to be embedded into prefix 
so that ISPs can easily apply relevant operations accordingly.

All comments are welcome.

Best regards,

Sheng

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 3:25 PM
> To: Sheng Jiang
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Sheng Jiang and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:      draft-jiang-semantic-prefix
> Revision:      00
> Title:                 Semantic IPv6 Prefix
> Creation date:         2012-07-09
> WG ID:                 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 9
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-semantic-prefix-00
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    Some Internet Service Providers desire to be aware of more
>    information about each packet, so that packets can be treated
>    differently and efficiently. IPv6, with a large address space, allows
>    semantics to be embedded into addresses. Routers can easily apply
>    relevant operations accordingly. This document provides analysis on
>    how to form semantic prefix and corresponding use cases, and
>    identifies the technical requirements to maximize the benefits of the
>    semantic prefix approach. It is recommended to use 4~12 bits in
>    prefix for embedded semantics.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to