On 26 Sep 2012, at 03:41 , Mohacsi Janos wrote: > RA-guard work mostly done at v6ops. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-08 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04 > > Probably drafts should be circulated on v6ops mailing list > and have support from there.
IETF v6ops WG Charter does not include updates to the IPv6 specifications. Quoting from this WG Charter: "Specifying any protocols or transition mechanisms is out of scope of the WG." IETF 6MAN WG Charter DOES include updates to the IPv6 specifications, again quoting from this WG Charter: "The working group will address protocol limitations/issues discovered during deployment and operation." This is why the draft-*-ra-guard-* documents (quoted above) belong in the IETF v6ops WG, while the 2 different I-Ds that I mentioned belong here in the IETF 6MAN WG. Now, in practice, the 2 draft-ietf-6man-* I-Ds that I mentioned before already have been reviewed by many folks in v6ops, as part of examining the RA Guard documents, and I believe there is broad support for these updates within v6ops. However, these 2 protocol specification updates are required to be handled by the IETF 6MAN WG, simply as a matter of the applicable IETF WG charters and usual IETF processes. Yours Ran -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------