Hi, Tim, On 11/05/2012 11:18 AM, Tim Chown wrote: > > Is there interest in promoting this idea further, and importantly any > IPR preventing doing so? Or is there reluctance from admins to rely on > RAs to configure a full server IPv6 address?
I've gone through the I-D, and found it valuable. Here are some comments/questions: * It looks like the ultimate goal of these tokenized addresses is that of renumbering? Am I right? This is pointed out in the abstract, but doesn't seem to be so clear form the Intro. * When it comes to servers, I guess they'd nevertheless need to update the corresponding DNS entries... So this proposal seems to be more targetted at, e.g., ACLs? Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
