Hi,

On Dec 8, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krish...@ericsson.com> 
wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The 4rd draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-4rd-04)
> describes a solution for providing IPv4 connectivity over IPv6. The
> draft describes the method for mapping 4rd IPv4 addresses to 4rd IPv6
> Addresses. It uses a 4rd specific mark called the V octet in the first 8

V-octet was AFAIR first time discussed within the Softwire MAP design team 
and I had/expressed my concerns already that time. My argumentation was that
we cannot just redefine the u & g bit use without actually having it verified
against and reflected in RFC4291. Glad to see it happening now ;)

IMHO the current language in RFC4291 does not give enough freedom to use
u=g=1, since such combination is not specifically left unused/reserved
(although u=g=1 makes no sense for the current IPv6). IEEE allows MAC
addresses that have I/G set to 1 and U/L set to 0, which makes me rather
uncomfortable with IETF using u=g=1 for their own purposes.

- Jouni


> bits of the Interface Identifier. There were some concerns raised in
> softwire about whether such addresses are actually compatible with the
> IPv6 addressing architecture. Whether this is actually compatible with
> the IPv6 addressing architecture is outside the scope of the softwire
> wg. Hence we would like to hear the 6man wg's perspective on this. I
> would like to request the wg to please go over the NOTE in Section 4.5
> page 18, which explains the issue, and over IANA Considerations Section
> 6, and chime in on whether this is acceptable from a 6man perspective.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to