On 18/12/2012 02:01, Fernando Gont wrote: ... > Nobody even suggested that. For instance, if these addresses had a > lifetime (in the RFC4941 sense), they wouldn't be called "stable" in the > first place.
I suggest that you add a discussion of site renumbering considerations. The problems described in draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem need to be avoided. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
