> The concern is that we are still mainly ignoring the renumbering
> problem, and in some years time this will be serious for users.
> But if you add "From the point of view of renumbering, these addresses
> behave like RFC4941 addresses" the point is covered.

... behave like RFC4862 addresses.

cheers,
Ole
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to