On 02/04/2013 07:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
In scenarios where privacy matters a lot, if our default policy is
"no privacy", those users "opting in" for privacy would be flagged
as "suspicious" just for the act of "opting in".
and 82.3% would not realize they needed to opt out.
i would think that, in general, across the ietf protocols, privacy
preservation would be the desired default.
Agreed. I have never understood why the default for this has always been
"off." Given that most implementations have ignored the RFC(s) and
enabled it by default anyway, I think it's time that we acknowledged
reality (both in the sense of what people are doing, and in the sense
that it's clearly working).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
