Le 2013-02-07 à 17:55, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> a écrit :
> On 02/07/2013 06:01 AM, Rémi Després wrote: >> Besides, these remaining concerns are aside from the question asked by >> Softwire > > Rémi, > > Do you admit to the possibility that the design coming from softwire might > have flaws that should be addressed before it proceeds? Of course I do! OTOH, the place to discuss efficiently potential design flaws is the WG where experts of the design are present. > > I'm not saying necessarily that it does, although people here a lot smarter > than me have raised concerns that I would like to see addressed in a manner > other than, "I don't want to talk about that." OK, please quote the exchange(s) you are referring to, and I will try to answer more. Note that preferring to discuss in a better forum isn't "I don't want to talk about that". Anyway, sorry if I gave this impression. Regards, RD > > Doug > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
