I made updates in response to this email and Dave's emails and made the table publicly viewable and editable if folks want to make further changes themselves: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Au4OS7RZgZwHdHozNzNHdUNtVEJSNlo3N3NFMG5Wa1E&usp=sharing
On May 24, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25/05/2013 10:04, Dave Thaler wrote: >> Thanks Alissa for the nice table, this is very helpful. > > Agreed. Two points though: > > 1. It seems to me that location tracking to the level of the 64-bit > prefix is *always* possible, which may well identify a specific > customer and/or physical location, but not a specific host and/or > user. That qualifies column (c). > > 2. For completeness, include static manual addresses (yes, they > still exist in IPv6), which presumably get "possible" in every > column. > > Brian > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
