On 6/12/2013 10:36 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 06/12/2013 07:06 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
Cc'd to INTAREA, where I believe fundamental changes to IP should be
discussed:
I disagree. This is nto a fundamental change, but rather a deployment
issue, well within the charter. See:
It can't be just a deployment issue if it updates 2460 to change how
fragmentation works.
The 6man working group is responsible for the maintenance, upkeep,
and advancement of the IPv6 protocol specifications and addressing
architecture. It is not chartered to develop major changes or
additions to the IPv6 specifications.
IPv6 already puts all the per-hop information before the fragmentation
header. Requiring the entire header chain to be inside the first
fragment is, IMO, a major change.
Joe
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
