Hi Fernando, > Considering the above, I guess I'm in the camp of "avoid fragmentation > where possible". However, I don't think I'd go as far as deprecating > it.
I was originally thinking this way too, but now I am thinking that deprecation of an old method is often the first step in the path to adoption of a new method that avoids the old issues. There have been examples in the past (e.g., deprecation of site locals leading to ULAs), and I don't see why it would be any different in this case. Thanks - Fred fred.l.templin@boeing,cim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
