> -----Original Message----- > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Fernando Gont
> If you're going to deprecate something on the assumption that some > implementation does something stupid about it, then I wonder what we'd > be left with. -- for instance, you should be deprecating Neighbor > Discovery, because many implementations do things such as allowing the > NCE to consume all memory, not doing any sanity checks on the received > link-layer addresses, etc., etc. The more I read arguments pro and con, the less I think fragmentation should be deprecated. Even in IPv4, fragmentation is always discouraged, but there are times when it comes in very handy. I'm honestly not sure why anything should be different, in this regard, with IPv6. The more differences IPv6 introduces, the more of a complete nuisance it becomes. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
