Don Sturek <d.stu...@att.net> wrote:
> We did a good bit of work on the mDNS topic and there are quite a few
> subtleties in the mDNS draft that are really focused only on correct link
> local operation. Here are a few (from RFC 6762):
Ah, I understand now, and I agree.
I thought you were saying that mDNS replies could not have ULAs in their
answer sections.
I agree that all of the things you mention have to be adjusted in order to
permit mDNS to work over MPL.
My question remains:
> I would like to know what a multi-link subnet via /128 means.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
pgpEHnbzUlXlU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
