Hi Brian, Yes, I followed the discussion about your draft. This is why I asked to be sure about my assumption.
Thank you for clarifications. Best, Hosnieh > > Hosnieh, > > Please see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-ug-01 > whose WG Last Call just ended, with a few comments to be incorporated. > > IMHO, since we seem to agree that these bits have no defined semantics in an > IID, you can specify them as you want in a new IID format. I would only > suggest > paying attention to the last paragraph of section 3: > > "To the extent that each method of IID creation specifies the values of the > "u" > and "g" bits, and that each new method is carefully designed in the light of > its > predecessors, these bits tend to reduce the chances of duplicate IIDs." > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 03/08/2013 09:18, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: > > Hello, > > > > have a question. Is it possible to use bits u and g (reserved bits) as > > part of the IID interface when using any IID generation approach? For > > instance, using it for SSAS. > > > > Thanks, > > Best, > > Hosnieh > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
