> Brian E Carpenter <mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
> 1 October 2013 23:48
> I know that a couple of people wanted the extra details suggested by Ray
> below. However, the explanation that I got from the 802.1 liaison
> (see my previous message) seems to me to make the details unimportant.
>
> Regards
> Brian

I see your point.

The IEEE response makes it clear to me that the examples I provided are
all perfectly valid, and it also confirms a more generic conclusion that
it is incorrect to assume uniqueness when utilising a L2 LAN-scope
address beyond its intended scope (to form an IID).

-- 
Regards,
RayH

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to