Le mercredi 12 mars 2014, 17:13:23 Simon Perreault a écrit : > Le 2014-03-12 17:03, Stéphane Guedon a écrit : > > inet 192.168.87.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > > 192.168.87.255 > > Does that mean that you intend to do double NAT? NAT64 then NAT44?
I don't really intend, but have no choice... I didn't think of that aspect. Is that important ? > > Simon [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
