Le 2014-03-12 17:22, Stéphane Guedon a écrit : >>> inet 192.168.87.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >>> 192.168.87.255 >> >> Does that mean that you intend to do double NAT? NAT64 then NAT44? > > I don't really intend, but have no choice... > I didn't think of that aspect. Is that important ?
Not really, no. It should work. Just curious what people actually do with our NAT64 code... :) Simon
