On Thursday 11 Nov 2010 22:27:03 jarrod.b.johnson at gmail.com wrote: > I do, will post tomorrow for review. It is conservative and may be > better done through refactoring boot_root_path in half... > > One objection I could see. IIRC, freebsd is a case where the pxe > payload will interpret root_path for nfs root and ipxe trying to interpret > could be odd..
I'm assuming that we should handle an existent but incomprehensible root-path (e.g. an NFS root-path) by noisily failing to hook the SAN device and then continuing with the normal filename boot. Michael
