On Friday 12 Nov 2010 20:17:58 Jarrod Johnson wrote: > Ok, patch for review at: > https://xcat.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xcat/xcat-dep/trunk/xnba/ipxe-regi > stersan.patch > > <https://xcat.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xcat/xcat-dep/trunk/xnba/ipxe-reg > istersan.patch>This patch was 'good enough' for my purposes. > > It does request another 256 byte set of chars. > > There is an amount of code duplication between 'boot_root_path' and > 'reg_root_path' in this approach.
Thanks. I'll rework this to avoid the duplication. Michael
