On 28/03/18 19:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The old coding resulted in a "data abort" when compiled with gcc 6.3 for
armhf and run on an Allwinner A20 SOC.
The unaligned access occured when path->Length was on an uneven address.
There's no way that the code:
- ( ( path->Length[1] << 8 ) | path->Length[0] ) );
should ever be able to produce an unaligned access abort, since it just
dereferences individual bytes. What do you see if you disassemble the
object code?
Michael
_______________________________________________
ipxe-devel mailing list
ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org
https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ipxe-devel
