That too Pete, lol Apologies for any confusion
Paul On 4/16/07, Pete Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Russ Edmonds wrote: > > *** What Paul has been trying to say is that a license is granted > > for a > > city which the station intends to cover. Neither the transmitter nor > > the studios are required to be in that town. The fact that a military > > base may be in itself a town or not is not really relevant, and since > > nothing to do with the stationsis on the base ( except for its > > signal ) > > there's no need for any permissions. > > We seem to be going around in circles on this. If a station's tower > is on a military base, it would seem to me that a lease with some > government entity would be required. "Permission to build a tower" > would be implied in such a lease. Perhaps what everyone is trying to > say is the fact that the FCC isn't concerned the tower or studios are > as long as the city of license is covered with the required amount of > signal. > > Pete Taylor > Tacoma, WA > 12225w 4719n > ICF2010 + Kiwa air core loop > DX398; Palomar loop > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > -- Paul B. Walker, Jr. www.walkerbroadcasting.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
