|
-
- 7
Mr.Imran Akhtar Shah Descon CyberWorld Member Executive Committee
Please study
clause # 6-a, 6-b and 6-c of MoA.
Bhutta
- 8 Mr.Imran Qureshi
Cyberaccess Member Executive Committee
- 9
Mr.Jamal Nasir
Super.Net Member Executive Committee
- 10
Mr.Naeem ul Haq
Nexlinx Member Executive Committee
- 11
Mr.Naveed Khan
Sat.net Member Executive Committee
- 12
Mr. Asif Luqman
Qazi Pakistan on line
Member Executive Committee
- 13
Mr.Tariq Pardesi
Digicom Member Executive Committee
- 14
Mr.V.A.Abdi
SJ,SI(M) High Net Member Executive Committee
- 15
Mr.Wahaj us
Siraj Comsats Member Executive Committee
- Best regards,Sanaullah
Bhutta,President ISPAK. Regards,
- Imran
-
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Imran Akhtar
Shah
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 5:49 PM
- Subject: ISPAK_EXECUTIVE: Re: THIS IS WRONG
- Dear Bhutta Sb,
- Let me start by saying that the efforts you had given for
the cause of the ISPAK will always be remembered and for that we
always be respecting you. I and my friends in ISPAK still
respect you and take you in very high esteem and honor.
- To put the record straight, the EC members who signed the
registration documents of ISPAK which lies with you in Karachi
had some names who are not members of EC ISPAK. Like Mr. Baweja
of NAPCOM. On getting to this info, I requested you umpteenth
times to remove this anomaly and at the same time communicated
to other EC members about this. Also Mr. Jamal Nasir and my name
deleted as EC members. And then Mr. Malik Mohammad Khan was made
General Secy and member of EC. He is very repectfull member of
ISPAK family but as the things stands today he is an active
member of ISPAK but not EC member.If this breach of confidence
then I would say I do not agree with you.
- Following is the EC members list for the info of all.
-
- MEMBERS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
-
- . S. # Name Address/Description Designation
- 1 Mr.Sanaullah Bhutta Napcom /Zoooom.net President
- 2 Mr. Muhammad Arshad Jalil CompuNet on
line Vice President South
- 3 Mr.Shahid Farooq Alvi Brain Net Vice President
North.
- 4 Mr.Ansar ul Haq Cyber Net Member Executive
Committee
- 5 Mr.Col. (R ) M.Ishaq Shoa,net Member Executive
Committee
- 6 Mr.Faisal Ahmed Fascom Member Executive Committee
- 7 Mr.Imran Akhtar Shah Descon CyberWorld Member
Executive Committee
- 8 Mr.Imran Qureshi Cyberaccess Member Executive
Committee
- 9 Mr.Jamal Nasir Super.Net Member Executive Committee
- 10 Mr.Naeem ul Haq Nexlinx Member Executive Committee
- 11 Mr.Naveed Khan Sat.net Member Executive Committee
- 12 Mr. Asif Luqman Qazi Pakistan on line Member
Executive Committee
- 13 Mr.Tariq Pardesi Digicom Member Executive Committee
- 14 Mr.V.A.Abdi SJ,SI(M) High Net Member Executive
Committee
- 15 Mr.Wahaj us Siraj Comsats Member
Executive Committee
- Regards,
- Imran
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Asif Luqman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- To: Sanaullah Bhutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Naeem Haq
- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; nadeem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Imran Akhtar Shah
- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Saad Saleem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 5:03 PM
- Subject: THIS IS WRONG
-
- > Dear Bhutta Sb.,
- >
- > Yes, Mr Imran told me that names in the EC are being
- > changed. And I don't think you should do it without
- > the approval of EC. Only EC or the General Body has
- > the right to decide this. Is this some kind of
- > "National Interest" that the
"commoners" are not
- > supposed to know? I will again request you not to file
- > this without consulting the EC first.
- >
- > On a different note, you appointed me the coordinator
- > of the committee to submit proposal of bandwidth. I
- > circulated a request among members to circulate the
- > proposals whoever has it. Nobody came up with any
- > proposal and Mr Faisal clearly replied that he had no
- > proposal at all. I don't think anyone has the right to
- > complain that he was not given a chance to submit a
- > proposal to the PTCL.
- >
- > Regards,
- > Asif
- >
- > --- Sanaullah Bhutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- > >
- > > You and every member has the right to move
vote of
- > > noconfidanc. If you
- > > desire you are most welcome. I have been contacted
- > > by many members for the
- > > same against those worked against the interest of
- > > ISPs in bandwidth issue.
- > > PTCL was offering us @ $.10000/- if we take
stand
- > > but you know better the
- > > whole story why now members will pay $.5000/-
extra
- > > for E1.
- > >
- > > Best wishes and regards,
- > > Bhutta
- > > ----- Original Message -----
- > > From: Naeem Haq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- > > To: Asif Luqman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; nadeem
- > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Imran
- > > Akhtar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Saad Saleem
- > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- > > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 6:34 PM
- > > Subject: ISPAK_EXECUTIVE: IMPORTANT
- > >
- > >
- > > >
- > > > Bhutta Sahib ,
- > > >
- > > > Despite being warned a number of times , you
have
- > > once again overstepped
- > > > your bounds and have gone to the extent of
- > > changing the name of the
- > > > association
- > > > to INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION of
- > > KARACHI . I personally think
- > > ,
- > > > this is enough for me to move the no
confidence
- > > vote , as of today I do
- > > not
- > > > regard you the president of ISPAK . You have
- > > forged signatures , kept
- > > > members
- > > > in the dark , abused your powers and even
changed
- > > the Executive committee
- > > > ...
- > > > Basically , "your" personal ISPAK
even if it is
- > > registered will be a BOGUS
- > > > organization
- > > > and your acts will greatly damage all ISPs in
- > > Pakistan . ISPAK belongs to
- > > > all ISPs of Pakistan and
- > > > we will fight to keep it that way .
- > > >
- > > > Please note that you are now solely
responsible
- > > for destroying the ISPs
- > > > unity which had achieved
- > > > a number of goals in the last few years .
- > > >
- > > > Knowing that you have singlehandedly
sabotaged all
- > > our efforts , and as a
- > > > result of your latest actions
- > > > we will definely lose the ISPAKs voice in the
- > > Ministry , PTCL , PTA etc .
- > > >
- > > > I would advise you to RETRACT your papers ,
and
- > > let the Executive members
- > > > do whatever is necessary to put ISPAK back on
- > > track .
- > > >
- > > > Again , I am ashamed at what has transpired
in the
- > > last few days , and
- > > hope
- > > > that
- > > > its not to late to start rebuilding ISPAK ,
as for
- > > now it seems you have
- > > > completely
- > > > destroyed the association for you personal
motives
- > > and convenience .
- > > >
- > > > Naeem Haq
- > > > NEXLINX
- > > >
- > > > P.S : I want all Exective Commitee Members to
send
- > > a clear message to
- > > Bhutta
- > > > Sahib that
- > > > such actions will not be tolerated .
- > > >
- > > >
- > > > -----Original Message-----
- > > > From: Asif Luqman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- > > > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 6:05 PM
- > > > To: nadeem; Imran Akhtar Shah; Saad Saleem;
Naeem
- > > Haq
- > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- > > > Subject: Re: ISPAK_EXECUTIVE: Re: ISPAK MOA
Latest
- > > >
- > > >
- > > > Dear Bhutta Sb.,
- > > >
- > > > Reportedly some changes have been made in the
MOA
- > > > without taking EC members into confidence. It
is
- > > my
- > > > humble request to inform the members
regarding
- > > these
- > > > changes and get their approval before filing
the
- > > > documents. Failing to do so will amount to a
- > > breach of
- > > > the mandate and the spirit of trust we have
been
- > > > working with.
- > > >
- > > > I hope you will handle the matters more
positively
- > > to
- > > > protect the organisation you have put so much
- > > effort
- > > > to build.
- > > >
- > > > Regards,
- > > > Asif
- > > >
- > > > --- nadeem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- > > > >
- > > > > Dear Imran,
- > > > >
- > > > > Thanks for taking in confidence. I have
reviewed
- > > the
- > > > > articles alongwith
- > > > > Saad.
- > > > >
- > > > > By the way, we were told that according
to
- > > Bhutta
- > > > > sb. the application for
- > > > > registration was already been filed.
What is the
- > > > > truth?
- > > > >
- > > > > There are some minor as well as critical
- > > > > observations which need to be
- > > > > discussed clause by clause in the
executive
- > > > > committee meeting and agreed
- > > > > upon.
- > > > >
- > > > > Among some technical mistakes the
serious
- > > concerns
- > > > > are about
- > > > >
- > > > > 1. election methodology of election of
- > > president. In
- > > > > our opinion the
- > > > > president and other office bearers
should be
- > > elected
- > > > > by general council in
- > > > > one go.
- > > > > 2. What happens if the elected president
leaves
- > > the
- > > > > organization and joins a
- > > > > new which is not eligible for membership
or he
- > > > > leaves Pakistan.
- > > > > 3. The presidenship should be on
rotation for
- > > all
- > > > > the regions.
- > > > > 4. The registered office must be
different from
- > > > > Head Office. HO must shift
- > > > > over with the president. If this does
not
- > > happen. it
- > > > > would mean that the
- > > > > president will always be from the
location of HO
- > > as
- > > > > no body (say from ISB)
- > > > > would like to shift over to KHI just for
ISPak.
- > > > >
- > > > > There are some other observations also.
I
- > > suggest to
- > > > > call EC meeting discuss
- > > > > and finalize.
- > > > >
- > > > > Regards
- > > > >
- > > > > Ahmad Nadeem Syed
- > > > >
- > > > >
- > > > >
- > > > >
- > > > >
- > > > > ----- Original Message -----
- > > > > From: "Imran Akhtar Shah"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- > > > > To: "Naeem Haq"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Saad
- > > > > Saleem"
- > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Ahmad Nadeem Syed"
|