Dear Bhutta Sb,
With due respect, the Executive Committee that
you are referring to is a committee selected by
yourself. We accepted to tolerate the MOA
submitted with your application for registration
of ISPAK, but that does not mean that everybody
agrees to all its content. It obviously contains
clauses that are not agreed upon.
I think the points raised by Naeem and Amer are
very genuine and straight-forward. If there is no
controversy involved, why to defer these
decisions to a selected EC ?
Regards,
Asif
--- SANAULLAH BHUTTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear Mr.Amir Shafi,
> AoA,
> Please see the minutes of meeting held in
> Karachi However your proposal has already been
> included in the Agenda of EC to held soon.
> Best regards.
> Sanaullah Bhutta.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amir Shafi - (cybersoft-tech)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Naeem Haq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> SANAULLAH BHUTTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Azfar
> Manzoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: ISPAK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, July 23, 2001 3:50 PM
> Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Final List of
> Arrears
>
>
> It is also my understanding and that was
> the main theme/spirit behind the proposal of
> this fund that the sum collected under election
> fund is for the new elected body and not to be
> utilised in settelment of old dues....Dear
> present members, pls. correct me if i am
> wrong....
> Regards,
> Amir Shafi
> Director - WOL
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Naeem Haq
> To: SANAULLAH BHUTTA ; Azfar Manzoor
> Cc: ISPAK
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:16 AM
> Subject: RE: ISPAK: Re: Final List of
> Arrears
>
>
> Dear All ,
>
> While I do understand that ISPAK is
> under funded , I do not know why was the
> election fund of 10,000 per voter required at
> this time . I think most of us agree that funds
> are required to run ISPAK and ISPs are not
> contributing as much as they should , infact
> some members are still to pay the initial
> Registration charges and Annual fees which are
> quite low . While we get ready to collect all
> the arrears ( onetime registration + monthly
> charges ) , I am still unclear about the motive
> of the election fund ... besides making it hard
> for members to vote !
>
> Anyway , now that the Rs.10,000 has
> been passed by the General vote , I feel that
> it would be best if the funds collected under
> the Election Fund are not utilized by the
> present body and should be reserved for handing
> over to the new body ; while all arrears
> collected should be utilized for paying off
> short term accumulated debts . This ofcourse is
> the only reasonable thing to do at this time ,
> as otherwise we would end up with a nely
> elected office bearers with a bankrupt ISPAK .
> Additionally , I would propose that the funds
> collected from the members should be only in
> the shape of Crossed Cheques issued by the ISP
> , all other forms of payment e.g cash etc
> should not be allowed as this would otherwise
> raise serious objections ... not to mention ,
> it would give rise to controversies , something
> that must be avoided at this time. In interest
> of fair and impartial elections , I would
> strongly recommend that :
>
> a) Only Crossed Cheques in favour of
> ISPAK should be acceptable from the members .
> b) The Election fund should be reserved
> for handover to newly elected body.
> c) Registration and Renweal arrears may
> be used for paying outstanding debts .
> c) The Election procedure should be
> comprehensively developed .
>
> I also feel that the date for voter
> eligibility should be extended to accomodate a
> larger group , however this is just a
> suggestion .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Naeem Haq
> NEXLINX
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of SANAULLAH BHUTTA
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001
> 11:38 AM
> To: Azfar Manzoor
> Cc: ISPAK
> Subject: ISPAK: Re: Final List of
> Arrears
>
>
> Dear Mr.Azfar Manzoor,
> AoA,
> You are right.
> New member have to pay Rs.10000/-
> for membership and extra Rs.10000/- to be voter
> as explained bellow by you It is 100% according
> to the MoA
>
> Best regards,
> Sanaullah Bhutta,
> President ISPAK.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Azfar Manzoor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: SANAULLAH BHUTTA
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sunday, July 22, 2001
> 9:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Final List of
> Arrears
>
>
>
> Thank you Bhutta Sahib. I will
> request you to make one clarification about the
> list of ISP's which are still not ISPAK
> members.
>
> Pasha forgot to mention the
> amount these guys should pay in the excel
> sheet. I think they should all pay Rs 20,000 if
> they want to vote (5000 registration, 5000
> renewal and 10000 election fund). If they do
> not want to vote then they can pay 10,000 and
> become members. It is 100% according to the
> MoA.
>
> If you agree then please issue
> the necessary clarification.
>
> Regards
>
> Azfar
>
> At 08:47 PM9/21/01+0500, you
> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> AoA,
> The attached list has been
> prepared with the help of Mr.Azfar Manzoor as
> incited by Mr. Asif Luqman Qazi Sahib.We are
> thankful to both of them.
>
> You are requested kindly
> contact to Secretary or Deputy Secretary for
> further information.
>
> Best regards.
> Sanaullah Bhutta,
> Received: from
> www.aol.net.pk [202.133.75.4] by
> fsg6.fascom.com with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-6.04) id
> AB871B7014C; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:02:47 +0500
> Received: from pasha
> ([202.133.75.118])
> by www.aol.net.pk
> (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id f6LF07c01595;
> Sat, 21 Jul 2001
> 20:00:07 +0500 (PKT)
> Message-ID:
> <010f01c111ed$673c2200$9168fea9@pasha>
> From: "Pasha"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Sanaullah Bhutta"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "sbhutta"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Final List of
> Arrears
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001
> 18:58:15 +0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type:
> multipart/mixed;
>
>
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010B_01C11217.18CFBDA0"
> X-Priority: 1
> X-MSMail-Priority: High
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook
> Express 5.00.2615.200
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By
> Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
> X-RCPT-TO:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
=== message truncated ===> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> N:;SANAULLAH BHUTTA
> FN:SANAULLAH BHUTTA
> ORG:NAPCOM PAKISTAN PRIVATE LIMITED;I.T
> TITLE:DIRECTOR
> NOTE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:PRESIDENT ,
> ISPAK =0D=0AINTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS
> ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN =
> =0D=0A114 - CAESAR TOWER SHAHRAH FAISAL
> KARACHI=0D=0A021-7786232 -7786339 =
> -FAX. 7786247 . 0300 243500
> TEL;WORK;VOICE:021- 111 627 627 - 5657105
> TEL;HOME;VOICE:0431 -214271 - 218813
> TEL;CELL;VOICE:0300 243500
> TEL;PAGER;VOICE:0300 243500
> TEL;WORK;FAX:021 -111 627627
> TEL;HOME;FAX:0431 -218813
> ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;021 -111
> 627 627;7 TH FLOOR=0D=0AREHGENT PLAZA
> HOTEL=0D=0ASHAH RAH FAISAL=
> ;KARACHI;SIND;;PAKISTAN
> LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:021 -111
> 627 627=0D=0A7 TH FLOOR=0D=0AREHGENT PLAZA
> HOTEL=0D=0ASHAH RAH FA=
> ISAL=0D=0AKARACHI, SIND=0D=0APAKISTAN
> ADR;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;STREE
> HABIB BANK=0D=0A BAGHBAN PURA =0D=0AHAFIZABAD
> ROAD;GUJRANWALA;PUNJA=
> B;522259;PAKISTAN
> LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:STREE
> HABIB BANK=0D=0A BAGHBAN PURA =0D=0AHAFIZABAD
> ROAD=0D=0AGUJRANWALA, P=
> UNJAB 522259=0D=0APAKISTAN
> URL:http://bhutta.com.pk
> URL:http://napcom.com.pk
> EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> REV:20010923T132316Z
> END:VCARD
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
