Dear ISPAK members
 
PASHA (software association) wants to file case with NEPRA...please see if you are interested to do so.
 
Ateeq Khan
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: [pashamembers] Re: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses

Hamza:

This is the response from Ejaz containing all details:

----
The starting point should be to identify the parties who would approach
NEPRA, and the engagement of counsel by the parties.  The counsel and a lead
rep of the parties would meet NEPRA for an informal discussion on the
proposed action plan.  Befor the meeting, the following matters would have
to be addressed-

    (i) statistics - number of applicants, their load and consumption
figures, bills paid over (say) the last year, their geographical
distribution, export earnings, comparison chart with other small and medium
industries regarding consumption patterns and revenues generated for WAPDA,
including projected growth;

    ii)    consumer category details:  load and consumption patterns,
voltages of supply, reliable power requirements - importantly, comparison
chart of loss for WAPDA if they move to self-generation (self-generation is
de-regulated - a sensitive issue for NEPRA and WAPDA), electricity bills as
a percentage of operating costs (would be useful if an industry average can
be figured out) in comparison with commercial and industrial consumers with
similar consumption patterns, revenue reduction for WAPDA if industrial
tariff allowed to the IT industry.

I can explain the relevance and importance of the above if you so like.
Briefly, it is not enough to say that we are an industry and therefore
industrial tariff should apply - if it were, the letters of the Minister
should have sufficed.  We have to say why non-application of industrial
tariff, despite Government's categorisation as an industry and therefor
entitlement to all concessions, is discriminatory vis-a-vis other consumer
categories, that is, HOW THE PRINCIPLES OF ELECTRICITY TARIFF DETERMINATIONS
WEIGH IN OUR FAVOUR.

Based on these figures, and data of WAPDA for commercial consumers (which I
will provide from WAPDA tariff petitions to NEPRA from time to time), a
petition would then be prepared with figures to demonstrate our case.  A
financial analyst or Excel wizard would be required to prepare case
scenarios - either the parties could provide him or the counsel can
sub-contract for him.

Procedurally, the petition would be filed with NEPRA alongwith a request for
reduction of petition fee (the latter having been discussed with NEPRA in
the informal meeting).  NEPRA in 14 days to admit the petition and then
forward a copy to WAPDA for a reply.  WAPDA in 14/21 days to reply.  NEPRA
will fix a date of hearing and the matter will proceed thereafter as if it
were a case in a Court of law.  Legally, NEPRA is required to decide the
case within six months of filing, but this matter should not take that long.

Wahaj, you know the legal charges, Rs. 3,500/- per hour for my time and Rs.
2,000/- per hour for my associate's time (two lawyers to deal with this
matter- cost effective to get spade work done by a junior lawyer), with a
20% reduction in the final bill if the number of hours utilised exceeds 100
hours.  NEPRA tariff matters are very specialised in nature, and require
ground work and research which is not main-stream - NEPRA may (and has in
the past) asked the petitioners to work on different case scenarios - in the
first tariff petition filed by WAPDA, NEPRA got them to work on and develop
several scenarios.  I could give a cap on the fees after I have held
preliminary meetings with the clients and looked at the documents and
figures forming the basis of our case- this ground work will be chargeable
at the above rate.  I would also be happy to give a legal opinion, but this
would duplicate the costs, as the parties can have a fairly good idea of the
strength of their case after a few preliminary meetings and review of the
scenarios developed in consultation with me.

Best regards,

Ejaz
-----

Ejaz also told me that 'Farmers Association' has filed a petition on similar grounds to NEPRA and their petition has been admitted. PASHA can become an 'intervener' in this petition. This would save a lot of cost on account of filing fee to NEPRA. According to Ejaz, this would be down from Rs. 250,000 to a few thousand rupees. Ejaz has checked unofficially with NEPRA and it's possible to do this. This also won't effect the PASHA's petition and it would carry same weight as a seperate petion.

Ejaz is the guy who actually drafted NEPRA's Act and has been their legal adviser for more than couple years.

Hamza: If this is OK with PASHA, then I can work with Ejaz to get the work started on this asap.

Best regards....Wahaj

Syed Hamza Matin wrote:

 Great speed Wahaj.... Can we have a time and cost estimate from Mr. Ejaz for pursuing such a venture and a second opinion. Lets form a group of members who would like to participate. May Wahaj take the lead and contact Sajjad in Lahore for any support. Anything related to Islamabad can be coordinated by Mohsin and we (Ateeq, Dr Zahir and Faisal ) are here in Karachi in case anything has to be followed at KESC level. Now its upto Wahaj to comeup with a concrete plan of action. Feel free to ask for any assistance. Please see if we can initiate by first calling on respective authorities or should we go into action rightaway... Good Luck ! Hamza    
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 This is what I got from Ejaz.

Wahaj

Ejaz Khan wrote:

 Dear Wahaj, Please see the attached.Cheers,Ejaz
----- Original Message -----
From: Ejaz Khan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:17 PMSubject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 Gentlemen, WAPDA/KESC have no discretion to refuse application of industrial tariff to IT industry.  The power lies with NEPRA.  Under the law, even the Federal Government cannot direct NEPRA in tariff matters. For this a petition has to be filed with NEPRA, and the NEPRA Tariff Rules (drafted by me) contain an elaborate mechanism requiring WAPDA/KESC to defend their stance on paper and by personal appearance. I believe the IT industry has a very strong case.  The tariff categorisation is not dependent on load.  The categories are determined by NEPRA after the promulgation of the NEPRA Act in 1997.  I understand that recently NEPRA caused the utilities to add a new industrial category for entities using their own high voltage transmission (on a petition filed by ICI) - this was initially opposed strongly by the utilities, but they lost the case. However, NEPRA fee rules prescribe exorbitant rates for tariff petitions.  For this, a formal request would have to be made, and the fee can be reduced by NEPRA. In order to follow the course of action outlined above and to proceed in a formal manner under the applicable legal regime, a petition would be prepared and filed with NEPRA to set the legal regime in motion.  The procedure is quite legalistic. Best regards, Ejaz Ishaq Khan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 Hamza, Faisal and Wahaj Now lets take a stance and fight it out. They have many big issues to resolve and this may be a minor issue for them. If we dont take interest then they are least bothered. Lets contact somebody like Mr Ejaz and proceed further. Before they think of something lets do it first. Regards Ateeq Khan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 Agreed. I suggest Barrister Ejaz Khan can provide good legal opinion on this (and also make our representation in case PASHA wants to go ahead with this) as he was an Adviser to NEPRA as well.

Regards....Wahaj
 

"Ateeq.M.Khan" wrote:

 Wahaj, In last case when PTCL wanted to raise the tariff but PTA after hearing from public did not allow PTCL to change the tariff similarly in our case WAPDA / KESC has sort of refused to oblige hence we as affected subscribers can lodge protest with NEPRA...what do you think. Ateeq
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 Ateeq,

NEPRA is there but such a policy directive would come from the Government itself. Just like MOST issues policy directives to PTCL to reduce the bandwidth rates and then PTCL gets the tariff approved from PTA. Anyway, there's no harm in making a representation to NEPRA for this.

Best regards....Wahaj

"Ateeq.M.Khan" wrote:

 Wahaj They have constituted NEPRA for all tariff related problems and we have to convince them first to allow for tariff change. If they agree then WAPDA/KESC will follow suit. I think even Ministry will also refer the case to NEPRA for resolution. RegardsAteeq
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 This matter was vigirosuly pursued when I was at Ministry of S&T. Minister and then Secretary has written many letters to WAPDA followed by phone calls. WAPDA finally refused to entertain the request. They also told that this could only be done at the Ministerial or Cabinet level and if Ministry of Water & Power asks WAPDA/KESC to do do, they'd do.

This is the text of letters written by the Minister and Secretary to WAPDA:

2(3)/2000-PSO
24 July 2000

Subject: ELECTRICITY RATES FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INDUSTRY
 

My dear General Zulfiqar Sahib:

 Information Technology (IT) today drives the technological and economic advancement of the developed as well as emerging economies and Government of Pakistan is committed to take a jump start in this field. The IT Policy and Action Plan envisages the rapid development of the IT industry in Pakistan through various policy measures and incentives. An issue which was brought up by the relevant Experts Groups who formulated the IT Policy was the high charges of electricity paid by the IT industry like Software Houses, Internet Service Providers, and allied services. WAPDA charges the electricity to the IT industry at commercial rates and not at the industrial rates whereas IT has already been declared by the Government as high tech industry.

2. IT industry is different from the conventional industry in that it does not require any production plants and machinery and the only hardware involved is the Personal Computers and networking equipment. The IT industry is knowledge based and relies  mainly on brain power as opposed to the electrical or mechanical power in the conventional industries.

3. On an average, an IT industry employing around 50 people consumes about 10,000 kWh of electricity per month, mostly used on air conditioning. A list of classification of IT industry is enclosed.

4. I would therefore request you to kindly get the relevant WAPDA’s rules changed so that Industrial tariff regime should be enforced for the IT industry as well. Since the electricity consumption by the IT companies in not high and the industry is still in its infancy stage, this decision would not cause much financial loss to WAPDA and would help the Government to achieve its broad economic objectives. Infact such a revision of rules would provide invaluable incentive for the much needed growth of the IT industry in our country.

 With kind personal regards.

Yours sincerely,
 
 
 

Prof. Atta-ur-Rahman
Minister

Lt. Gen. Zulfiqar Ali Khan
Chairman
WAPDA
Lahore
-----
Government of Pakistan
Ministry of Science & Technology
IT & Telecommunications Division
Office of the Secretary
Tel: +92 51 920 9484 Fax: +92 51 920 9482

2(3)/2000-PSO
04 September 2000

Subject: ELECTRICITY RATES FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INDUSTRY

Dear

 Please refer to the letter of the Minister for Science & Technology dated 24 July 2000 on the subject. I would appreciate if action on the matter is expedited and a notification may please be issued accordingly.

 With best regards.
 

Yours sincerely,
 
 

Abu Shamim M. Ariff
Secretary

Lt. Gen. Zulfiqar Ali Khan
Chairman
WAPDA
Lahore
-----

2(3)/2000-PSO
30 September 2000
 

Subject: ELECTRICITY RATES FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INDUSTRY
 

My dear Lt. General Zulfiqar Sahib:
 

 Kindly refer to my letter of 02 August 2000 and a subsequent reminder from the Secretary IT & Telecommunications Division on the subject. Copies of the both letters are enclosed. I would be grateful if you could kindly respond to this as the matter is quite important for the IT industry and requires urgent attention.

With kind personal regards.
 

Yours sincerely,
 
 
 

Prof. Atta-ur-Rahman
Minister

Lt. Gen. Zulfiqar Ali Khan
Chairman
WAPDA
Lahore

----

Best regards....Wahaj

"Ateeq.M.Khan" wrote:

Faisal The No.1 Guy that is MD is also from the Army. But anyway that will surely help. Last month I tried my luck on advice of Mr Furqan Qureshi but of no use. They do not even reply to your letters! They have extremely bad relations with DAWN hence all stories, news item and letters to the editors are ignored by them. Hamza's point about Legal Notice has weight because I have seen similar notice served by the Dairy Farm Association to KESC about rates. The Authority we have to appeal is NEPRA and not KESC directly. And please do include all LEGAL IT entities like Software Houses, ISPs, Call Centres, Institutes etc who are registered with their associations and one govt controlled agencies like in our case its ISPAK and PTA and in S/W/H its PASHA and PSEB may be. RegardsAteeq KhanCEOGem Net
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
Sorry for the double post, I forgot to mention the gentleman works in KESC.
 

Folks,

I don't know if this will help or not, the number 2 person after the MD is an Army guy, and I know him. Actually his wife is a good colleague of mine and she is IN the IT business. Perhaps we can call her and explain her the situation so in turn she can tell it to her hubby? No harm in giving this a try?

What do you say?

Faisal
 
 
 

At 01:45 AM 1/2/02, you wrote:

Dear Dr Zahir Sahab, AoA

Yes, this has been going on for a year now. We have included the matter in
every discussion at every level. I think Wapda / Kesc have their own
priorities. I had a discussion with our new MD PSEB Suhail few days back on
the topic and he had indicated that Wapda have agreed to give industrial
tariff to STPs only. Ofcourse it's unjustified and unfair. I hope Suhail
would take up with Ministry of Water and Power again for unified rate on
priority and its more important then several high stake projects PSEB
intends to take up.

In present state, if you have a load of over 70 KVA, you are entitled for a
relief from KESC, it's not much a favor as such. IT is the only industry in
Pakistan, which is seen as Industry by its constituents only, special
status!

Please elaborate, Can we take up with KESC/Wapda directly from P@SHA. May be
send them a notice or take up some legal recourse.

Any suggestion.

Regards

Hamza

----- Original Message -----
From: Tariq O. Rehman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: RE: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 

It seems to me that the government authorities still think that the software
output is by the kilos packed in jute bags. "The more the kilos produced,
the bigger the factory; the bigger the factory - more of the consumption;
more of the consumption - greater the revenues for us; the greater the
revenues - more of bad debts. See we told you factories produce more bad
debts!"

This reminds me of a request to a senior government  officer for
installation of air-conditioners on the first floor for the staffs
residential accomodation in Multan, because of extreme heat in summers. The
request was declined by the senior officer on the grounds, that the laws of
Physics told him that the higher you go, the cooler it is!

Still want to talk about bulk rates for software houses?

Tariq Rehman
-----Original Message-----
From: Zahir Ali Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pashamembers] Fw: KESC Industrial rates for Software houses
 

Dear Hamza,

Can you or any one else shed any light on the letter given below?

This letter seems to indicate that Industrial rates are available to STP's
only if their consumption is above a certain load. The questions that come
to mind are 1) When software has been declared as an industry why is there a
minimum load criterion. 2) Since all the benefits that a software house
enjoys in a STP are available to software houses that are not housed in
STP's . Is this letter equally applicable to these organizations also.

Regards

Zahir
 
 
 
 
 
 

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
 

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 
 
 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/xYTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


 

Faisal Khan,
CEO

________________________________

151 N. Michigan Avenue,
Suite 3607,
Chicago, IL 60601

Tel: (312) 861-9488
Fax: (312) 861-0446
________________________________

1107 Park Avenue, 24-A, Block 6,
PECHS, Main Shahrah-e-Faisal,
Karachi 74500 Pakistan

Tel: +92 (21) 4544346
Fax: +92 (21) 4544347
________________________________

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Reply via email to