[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995170#comment-15995170
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1043:
-----------------------------------------

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1244


> NettyConnector not working with IPv6 address
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1043
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1043
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.3
>            Reporter: Jeff Mesnil
>             Fix For: 1.5.5, 2.next
>
>
> Artemis client doesn't correctly enclose IPv6 address when sending HTTP 
> upgrade packet. 
> According to [RFC2732 | https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2732.txt], section {{2. 
> Literal IPv6 Address Format in URL's Syntax}} and [HTTP header field 
> definition 
> specification|https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html], 
> correct request URL should be enclosed like following one: 
> {{http://[fe80::56ee:75ff:fe47:c83e]}} 
> Following code snippet creates request for URL 
> {{http://fe80::56ee:75ff:fe47:c83e}} 
> {code} 
> HashMap<String, Object> map = new HashMap<String, Object>(); 
> map.put("host", "fe80::56ee:75ff:fe47:c83e"); 
> map.put("port", "8080"); 
> map.put(TransportConstants.HTTP_UPGRADE_ENABLED_PROP_NAME, true); 
> TransportConfiguration transportConfiguration = new 
> TransportConfiguration(NettyConnectorFactory.class.getName(), map); 
> ConnectionFactory cf = 
> ActiveMQJMSClient.createConnectionFactoryWithoutHA(JMSFactoryType.CF, 
> transportConfiguration); 
>  connection = cf.createConnection(); 
> {code} 
> This works fine when client connects directly to the server. However it may 
> cause problems when Artemis connects to proxy which expects IPv6 address 
> correctly enclosed. 
> Artemis client should detect IPv6 address and enclose it, so it conforms to 
> specification.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to