[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4314?focusedWorklogId=865882&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-865882
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4314:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 15/Jun/23 21:03
            Start Date: 15/Jun/23 21:03
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: clebertsuconic commented on PR #4509:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4509#issuecomment-1593721108

   another option would be to use a sycnhronize block everywhere to make sure 
the flow control is correct.. so it's better to just use the same executor 
guaranteeing the proper threading I think.




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 865882)
    Time Spent: 1h  (was: 50m)

> Federation, support consumerWindowSize zero and federate in batches only when 
> the local queue is has excess capacity
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4314
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4314
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Federation
>    Affects Versions: 2.28.0
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.29.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Dual queue federation, where clusters federate in both direction can suffer 
> from message flip flopping once the priority adjustment kicks in.
> If there is a large backlog, the lower priority federation consumer is in 
> play once all of the local consumer credit is exhausted and the backlog can 
> drain to the other cluster.
> If demand is low there, the process can repeat. limiting the rate of the 
> federation consumer can help but it is not ideal b/c when there is no local 
> demand, we want to have a high rate of migration.
>  
> A possible solution is to have the federation consumer manage its own credit 
> and only flow messages when the local queue has capacity. Then flow a batch 
> of messages, and await again that the local queue has capacity. In this way, 
> there is no thundering herd effect, but there is also fast migration of 
> messages once there is demand.
> the consumerWindowSize=0 is already in play for consumer.receive calls and 
> there is already a defaultConsumerWindowSize for an address. These can be 
> combined to realise batchFederationOnCapacity semantics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to