[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4314?focusedWorklogId=865979&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-865979
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4314:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 16/Jun/23 10:11
Start Date: 16/Jun/23 10:11
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: gtully commented on code in PR #4509:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4509#discussion_r1232058024
##########
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/Queue.java:
##########
@@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ default int retryMessages(Filter filter, Integer
expectedHits) throws Exception
boolean hasMatchingConsumer(Message message);
Review Comment:
agree, I was leaving it unchanged but calling it what it is
PendingMessageCount is best, sorted. thanks.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 865979)
Time Spent: 1h 50m (was: 1h 40m)
> Federation, support consumerWindowSize zero and federate in batches only when
> the local queue is has excess capacity
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-4314
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4314
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Federation
> Affects Versions: 2.28.0
> Reporter: Gary Tully
> Assignee: Gary Tully
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.29.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Dual queue federation, where clusters federate in both direction can suffer
> from message flip flopping once the priority adjustment kicks in.
> If there is a large backlog, the lower priority federation consumer is in
> play once all of the local consumer credit is exhausted and the backlog can
> drain to the other cluster.
> If demand is low there, the process can repeat. limiting the rate of the
> federation consumer can help but it is not ideal b/c when there is no local
> demand, we want to have a high rate of migration.
>
> A possible solution is to have the federation consumer manage its own credit
> and only flow messages when the local queue has capacity. Then flow a batch
> of messages, and await again that the local queue has capacity. In this way,
> there is no thundering herd effect, but there is also fast migration of
> messages once there is demand.
> the consumerWindowSize=0 is already in play for consumer.receive calls and
> there is already a defaultConsumerWindowSize for an address. These can be
> combined to realise batchFederationOnCapacity semantics.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
