[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18020751#comment-18020751
]
Matt Pavlovich edited comment on AMQ-9599 at 9/16/25 6:58 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure we should change this, since the meaning could be different, and
if we change it now it would break existing users that are monitoring this
value.
Perhaps an additional metric -- activeDateTime is needed to show when this
broker became an active primary?
was (Author: mattrpav):
I'm not sure we should change this, since the meaning could be different.
Perhaps an additional metric -- activeDateTime is needed to show when this
broker became an active primary?
> Broker 'startDate' should be set only when the broker actually starts
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-9599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9599
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Broker
> Reporter: Martin Lichtin
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.2.0
>
>
> Broker 'startDate' should be set only when the broker actually starts
> Currently, the 'startDate' is set too early and does not cater for the
> situation of a slave broker waiting to start until it can acquire the lock.
> Should probably set 'startDate' only in method
> {color:#000000}doStartBroker(){color}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
