[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18020751#comment-18020751
]
Matt Pavlovich commented on AMQ-9599:
-------------------------------------
I'm not sure we should change this, since the meaning could be different.
Perhaps an additional metric -- activeDateTime is needed to show when this
broker became an active primary?
> Broker 'startDate' should be set only when the broker actually starts
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-9599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9599
> Project: ActiveMQ Classic
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Broker
> Reporter: Martin Lichtin
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.2.0
>
>
> Broker 'startDate' should be set only when the broker actually starts
> Currently, the 'startDate' is set too early and does not cater for the
> situation of a slave broker waiting to start until it can acquire the lock.
> Should probably set 'startDate' only in method
> {color:#000000}doStartBroker(){color}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
