[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16262907#comment-16262907
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARROW-1816:
---------------------------------------
BryanCutler commented on issue #1330: ARROW-1816: [Java] Resolve new vector
classes structure for timestamp, date and maybe interval
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1330#issuecomment-346408827
> @BryanCutler I am a bit reluctant to check unit and timezone in value
holders because of performance reasons.
Yeah it doesn't make sense to do all these checks each access, so I just
wanted to pose the question to make sure it wasn't a blocker for doing this
refactor. I don't use the holder APIs so it's fine with me but maybe
@siddharthteotia has some thoughts on this?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> [Java] Resolve new vector classes structure for timestamp, date and maybe
> interval
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-1816
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1816
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Li Jin
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> Personally I think having 8 vector classes for timestamps is not great. This
> is discussed at some point during the PR:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1203#discussion_r145241388
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
