[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16890370#comment-16890370 ]
Reuven Lax commented on BEAM-6858: ---------------------------------- Inside ParDo, you will need to get the rest of the information of the PCollectionView, which means that somewhere a map of TupleTag -> PCollectionView needs to be maintained. [~kenn] do you have advice on where the best place to do this is? > Support side inputs injected into a DoFn > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: BEAM-6858 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6858 > Project: Beam > Issue Type: Bug > Components: sdk-java-core > Reporter: Reuven Lax > Assignee: Shehzaad Nakhoda > Priority: Major > > Beam currently supports injecting main inputs into a DoFn process method. A > user can write the following: > @ProcessElement public void process(@Element InputT element) > And Beam will (using ByteBuddy code generation) inject the input element into > the process method. > We would like to also support the same for side inputs. For example: > @ProcessElement public void process(@Element InputT element, > @SideInput("tag1") String input1, @SideInput("tag2") Integer input2) > This requires the existing process-method analysis framework to capture these > side inputs. The ParDo code would have to verify the type of the side input > and include them in the list of side inputs. This would also eliminate the > need for the user to explicitly call withSideInputs on the ParDo. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)