[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17350926#comment-17350926
 ] 

Ruben Q L commented on CALCITE-4617:
------------------------------------

BTW, I just found an old (related?) ticket that was supposed to deal with 
offset issues in SortJoinTransposeRule: CALCITE-1507
{code}
    // 3) If sort has an offset, and if the non-preserved side
    // of the join is not count-preserving against the join
    // condition, we bail out
{code}

[~sylvaincrozon], [~julianhyde] do you think that patch was wrong / incomplete? 
It seems the current PR is "fixing" precisely one of the tests 
(testSortJoinTranspose6) added by CALCITE-1507. Should we focus on fixing 
CALCITE-1507's logic (if it needs to be fixed) rather than just using {{null}} 
offset? Also, notice that there is another test added by CALCITE-1507 
(testSortJoinTranspose7) that verifies that OFFSET is cannot be pushed (and the 
rule is not applied).


> Wrong offset when SortJoinTransposeRule pushes a sort node with an offset
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4617
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4617
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.26.0
>            Reporter: Sylvain Crozon
>            Assignee: Ruben Q L
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.27.0
>
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The SortJoinTransposeRule will push a sort node past a join, and then 
> duplicate the sort node on top of the join. When the sort node has an offset, 
> we should only apply it once, otherwise we end up skipping twice as many rows 
> as we should. The sort node added on top of the join should have a null 
> offset.
>  
> For example the testSortJoinTranspose6 test checks that for this initial plan
> {code}
> LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$0], EMPNO=[$2])
>   LogicalSort(offset=[2], fetch=[10])
>     LogicalJoin(condition=[=($0, $9)], joinType=[right])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, DEPT]])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
> {code}
> the SortJoinTransposeRule should convert to
> {code}
> LogicalProject(DEPTNO=[$0], EMPNO=[$2])
>   LogicalSort(offset=[2], fetch=[10])
>     LogicalJoin(condition=[=($0, $9)], joinType=[right])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, DEPT]])
>       LogicalSort(offset=[2], fetch=[10])
>         LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
> {code}
> Which will result in applying the offset twice. Instead the LogicalSort on 
> top of the join should just have a null offset



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to