[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18073365#comment-18073365
 ] 

Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-7463:
----------------------------------------------

As others mentioned already, the example query is non deterministic so we 
cannot really say that transformation is invalid. I would also be curious to 
understand better the motivation behind this change. Which use-case will 
benefit from the "fix"?

Another point to keep in mind is that ORDER BY and LIMIT in sub-queries are 
optional features from a SQL standard perspective so some systems may not even 
allow such constructs (see CALCITE-4160 for more details around ORDER BY).

> UnionToFilterRule incorrectly rewrites UNION with LIMIT
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-7463
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7463
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.41.0
>            Reporter: Zhen Chen
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.42.0
>
>
> The {{UnionToFilterRule}} produces incorrect results when applied to inputs 
> that contain {{{}LIMIT{}}}.
> Specifically, the rule incorrectly collapses:
> {code:java}
> (SELECT mgr, comm FROM emp LIMIT 2)
> UNION
> (SELECT mgr, comm FROM emp LIMIT 2) {code}
> into:
> {code:java}
> SELECT DISTINCT mgr, comm FROM emp LIMIT 2 {code}
> This transformation is {*}not semantically equivalent{*}.
> *Reproduction*
> SQL
> {code:java}
> (SELECT mgr, comm FROM emp LIMIT 2)
> UNION
> (SELECT mgr, comm FROM emp LIMIT 2) {code}
> h4. Plan Before
> {code:java}
> LogicalUnion(all=[false])
>   LogicalSort(fetch=[2])
>     LogicalProject(MGR=[$3], COMM=[$6])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
>   LogicalSort(fetch=[2])
>     LogicalProject(MGR=[$3], COMM=[$6])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]]) {code}
> *Plan After (Incorrect)*
> {code:java}
> LogicalAggregate(group=[{0, 1}])
>   LogicalSort(fetch=[2])
>     LogicalProject(MGR=[$3], COMM=[$6])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]]) {code}
> *Expected Behavior*
> The transformation should NOT be applied when any input of UNION contains 
> LogicalSort(That contains ORDER BY, LIMIT, OFFSET). 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to