[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14953965#comment-14953965
]
Jacques Nadeau commented on CALCITE-911:
----------------------------------------
Let's get this resolved for 1.5.
[~julianhyde], do you have preference for which approach from above to take? It
seems like removing the caching behavior from the existing calcite schema class
is the least intrusive/impactful.
> Make CalciteSchema extendible for different implementation.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-911
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-911
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jinfeng Ni
> Assignee: Jinfeng Ni
> Fix For: 1.5.0-incubating
>
>
> CalciteSchema by default uses cache to store table, sub-schema, function.
> This would work perfectly for schema-based system, yet would create problem
> for Drill, which dynamically explore the schema on the fly during query
> execution.
> One solution is to refactor CalciteSchema and make it as an interface. The
> default implementation would still use the current implementation. Further,
> it would other system to extend the default behavior and make CalciteSchema
> works for Drill as well.
> Background information: The issue around CalciteSchema is one of the reasons
> that Drill has to use a forked version of Calcite. Hopefully, if we could
> resolve this issue, we are one step further to remove the forked Calcite in
> the near future.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
