[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-21123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-21123:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.8.0
> Fix issue related to flaky test SimpleLRUCacheTest.concurrentPut
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-21123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-21123
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 4.8.0
> Reporter: Aurélien Pupier
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.8.0
>
>
> This test is often failing (and often with all the parameterized tests when
> it happens):
> {noformat}
> org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: Should have completed within a
> reasonable timeframe ==> expected: <true> but was: <false>
> at
> org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.build(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:151)
> at
> org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertionFailureBuilder.buildAndThrow(AssertionFailureBuilder.java:132)
> at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.failNotTrue(AssertTrue.java:63)
> at org.junit.jupiter.api.AssertTrue.assertTrue(AssertTrue.java:36)
> at org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue(Assertions.java:214)
> at
> org.apache.camel.support.cache.SimpleLRUCacheTest.concurrentPut(SimpleLRUCacheTest.java:353)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:179)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:183)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:992)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
> at
> java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1625)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
> at
> java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1625)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
> at
> java.base/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1625)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:150)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:173)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
> at
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:194)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165)
> {noformat}
> it failed on ubuntu and ppc64le
> in the last 5 builds, there was at least one failure of these parameterized
> tests
> the timeout mentioned was already doubled recently from 10 to 20 seconds.
> This is suspicious and given that iti related to a "concurrent" access, there
> might be a real problem in th elogic.
> I wasn't able to reproduce locally even after launching a lot of times
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
