[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-23283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bjorn Beskow updated CAMEL-23283:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
When using camel-micrometer-observability, traces and spans are not correctly 
structured if a traceId and root span is not already present (as a result of 
OTEL context propagation from the caller, or by a Spring Boot framework 
component in front of the camel component).

The effect is twofold:
 * traceId and spanId is not put in the MDC context, and hence not present in 
any logs created.
 * Nested spans created programmatically using the Micrometer Observation API 
are not properly nested (they get their own, unique traceId's).

The attached sample project pinpoints the problem: For an exchange with a 
"traceparent" propagated from the caller, everything works as expected. For an 
exchange without a propagated existing trace, the tests show that the MDC is 
not properly populated and any nested spans have the wrong structure.

This seems to be caused by missing scope management: 
MicrometerObservabilitySpanAdapter::activate() only calls span.start() but 
doesn't put the
span into the tracer's thread-local scope. This means tracer.currentSpan() 
returns null during route execution, hence the span is invisible to e.g. 
programmatic child span creation that relies on tracer.currentSpan() to find a 
parent span (for example via the ObservationRegistry). It also becomes 
invisible for the MDC context.

  was:
When using camel-micrometer-observability, traces and spans are not correctly 
structured if a traceId and root span is not already present (as a result of 
OTEL context propagation from the caller, or by a Spring Boot framework 
component in front of the camel component).

The effect is twofold:
 * traceId and spanId is not put in the MDC context, and hence not present in 
any logs created.
 * Nested spans created programmatically using the Tracer are not properly 
nested (they get their own, unique traceId's).

This seems to be caused by missing scope management: 
MicrometerObservabilitySpanAdapter::activate() only calls span.start() but 
doesn't put the
span into the tracer's thread-local scope. This means tracer.currentSpan() 
returns null during route execution, hence the span is invisible to e.g. 
programmatic child span creation that relies on tracer.currentSpan() to find a 
parent span. It also becomes invisible for the MDC context.


> OpenTelemetry/Micrometer traces are not correctly structured for 
> JMS-initiated routes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-23283
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-23283
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: camel-tracing
>    Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 4.16.0, 4.17.0, 4.18.0, 4.18.1
>            Reporter: Bjorn Beskow
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: jms-micrometer-observability.zip
>
>
> When using camel-micrometer-observability, traces and spans are not correctly 
> structured if a traceId and root span is not already present (as a result of 
> OTEL context propagation from the caller, or by a Spring Boot framework 
> component in front of the camel component).
> The effect is twofold:
>  * traceId and spanId is not put in the MDC context, and hence not present in 
> any logs created.
>  * Nested spans created programmatically using the Micrometer Observation API 
> are not properly nested (they get their own, unique traceId's).
> The attached sample project pinpoints the problem: For an exchange with a 
> "traceparent" propagated from the caller, everything works as expected. For 
> an exchange without a propagated existing trace, the tests show that the MDC 
> is not properly populated and any nested spans have the wrong structure.
> This seems to be caused by missing scope management: 
> MicrometerObservabilitySpanAdapter::activate() only calls span.start() but 
> doesn't put the
> span into the tracer's thread-local scope. This means tracer.currentSpan() 
> returns null during route execution, hence the span is invisible to e.g. 
> programmatic child span creation that relies on tracer.currentSpan() to find 
> a parent span (for example via the ObservationRegistry). It also becomes 
> invisible for the MDC context.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to