[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13790186#comment-13790186
 ] 

Sergey Zolotaryov commented on CAMEL-6791:
------------------------------------------

Ok. I figured out how to fix the code. Camel example on splitter helped a lot :)

Here is what has to be used in order for the aggregation work: 1) specify the 
aggregation strategy in split definition, not after it, otherwise it does not 
work; 2) after the processor that handles split sub-exchanges you must say 
end() so that sub-exchanges don't get returned by jetty. 

Here is how the changed code looks like:

{code}
route = route.split(splitExchangeIntoOneExchangePerFile(), new 
GroupedExchangeAggregationStrategy());

// now move/copy(?) the files to final destination
route = route.to("file://output?fileName=${header." + BATCH_FILE_INDEX + 
"}.txt").end();

// no explicit aggregation afterwards
{code}

> Aggregation result is lost when used with Jetty http endpoint
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-6791
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6791
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-http
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.0, 2.12.1
>         Environment: windows 7
>            Reporter: Sergey Zolotaryov
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: test.zip
>
>
> We have a requirement to return the result of some processing in an HTTP 
> response. Here's how this looks:
> Jetty http endpoint triggers processing -> 
> data is retrieved into an iterator -> 
> multiple renderers process the model objects and write output to temporary 
> files -> 
> a file endpoint copies files to final destination ->
> an aggregator puts generated file names into exchange body as a list ->
> the camel servlet renders the exchange body
> Everything goes well until the final step, where we can only see the 
> filenames of temporary files, but not the final ones. Looks like the 
> aggregation result is just ignored. I am attaching an eclipse project where 
> you can just see how it happens.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to