[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000926#comment-15000926
 ] 

David Williams commented on CAMEL-8302:
---------------------------------------

I have created a PR implementing the logic suggested in the original 
description. I took this approach rather than the one suggested above (setting 
the queue to null) to avoid backwards compatibility issues for those who may be 
relying on the random integer queues.

> Rabbitmq shouldn't require/bind queue if not specified 
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-8302
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8302
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-rabbitmq
>    Affects Versions: 2.14.1
>            Reporter: Sajjad Akhter
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> Current implementation is declaring both exchange and queue on any init 
> (producer or consumer). In case of producer one don't need queue and may not 
> know who going to be client. 
> We can add flag skipQueueDeclare  so that it won't genrate uuid queue. 
> i can provide PR if it helps. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to