[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15028321#comment-15028321
 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9355:
------------------------------------

I dont think the code is easier, before it was reusing existing code.

A problem is that this code introduced a background thread per throttler that 
does the release.
Another problem is the async delated task is not scheduled, but submit so the 
task can run repeatedly which can suck up CPU cycles. in case it keeps looping 
trying to acquire a semaphore, which is not granted, and then its re-added to 
the async task, which then re-run this again, over and over.


> Current Throttler implementation is not accurate and does not work in a 
> multi-threaded route
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-9355
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.16.0
>            Reporter: Aaron Whiteside
>         Attachments: CAMEL_9355.patch
>
>
> Current Throttler implementation is not accurate and is even more inaccurate 
> in a multi-threaded route (think sjms....consumerCount=100).
> The delay to sleep cannot be calculated ahead of time in a multi-threaded 
> environment, to this end the Throttler should not extend 
> DelayProcessorSupport.
> Attached is a patch that changes throttler to use a Semaphore to do accurate 
> and multi-thread safe throttling.
> The code I think is much cleaner, smaller and easier to understand. Than it 
> used to be before.
> Unit tests still pass, I had to make some changes to ThrottlerTest as it made 
> assumptions about the implementation and was doing bad things like adding a 
> 750ms buffer to validating the minimum throttle delay.. ThrottlerTest is now 
> very sane.
> I've also implemented support to allow the throttler construct to be used 
> without any nested outputs. For example the follow code is now valid.
> {code}
> <throttle><constant>100</constant></throttle> 
> {code}
> If you want to disable this feature it can be done in 
> ThrottlerDefinition::createProcessor() line 82 changing false to true.
> I think this allows more flexible usage of the throttler, in my use case I 
> want to delay the further execution of the route, and I don't want to have to 
> split my routes up into separate sub-routes to be able to do that. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to