[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-12628.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Claus Ibsen
Fix Version/s: 2.23.0
The up-to-date doc is at
[https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/camel-hawtdb/src/main/docs/hawtdb.adoc]
I have updated it and marked it more as deprecated and also removed that part
about AMQ
> [doc] camel-hawtdb documentation should be updated
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-12628
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-12628
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-hawtdb, documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.22.0
> Reporter: Torsten Mielke
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: camel-hawtdb, documentation
> Fix For: 2.23.0
>
>
> The documentation for [camel-hawtdb |http://camel.apache.org/hawtdb.html]says:
> {quote}
> The [HawtDB|http://hawtdb.fusesource.org/] project is being deprecated and
> replaced by [leveldb|https://code.google.com/p/leveldb/] as the lightweight
> and embedable key value database. To make using leveldb easy there is a
> [leveldbjni|https://github.com/fusesource/leveldbjni] project for that. The
> Apache ActiveMQ project is planning on using leveldb as their primary file
> based message store in the future, to replace kahadb.
> {quote}
> The last part about ActiveMQ replacing KahaDB with LevelDB is out of date.
> LevelDB has been deprecated on ActiveMQ and KahaDB remains the standard
> persistence adapter. The top level warning on
> http://activemq.apache.org/leveldb-store.html.
> So I suggest to remove that sentence at minimum.
> Also, I am not sure do we still recommend LevelDB as an alternative to hawtdb
> or would there be even better options these days?
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
