[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17416709#comment-17416709
]
Zoran Regvart commented on CAMEL-16982:
---------------------------------------
There seems to be some special handling of Bindy in the tooling:
{code}
tooling/maven/camel-package-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/maven/packaging/PrepareCatalogMojo.java
740: // special for bindy
741: if (dataformat.startsWith("bindy")) {
742: dataformat = "bindy";
tooling/maven/camel-package-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/maven/packaging/UpdateReadmeMojo.java
288: if ("bindy".equals(dataFormatName)) {
304: // for now it's only applied to bindy but can be
unlocked for other dataformats if needed
305: if ("bindy".equals(dataFormatName)) {
446: if (name.startsWith("bindy")) {
447: return "bindy";
455: if (name.startsWith("bindy")) {
tooling/maven/camel-package-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/maven/packaging/PackageDataFormatMojo.java
343: if ("type".equals(option.getName()) &&
"bindy".equals(model.getModelName())) {
345: case "bindy-csv":
348: case "bindy-fixed":
351: case "bindy-kvp":
431: } else if ("bindy-csv".equals(name) || "bindy-fixed".equals(name)
|| "bindy-kvp".equals(name)) {
432: return "bindy";
466: // TODO: split json / bindy into multiple jsons descriptors
485: } else if ("bindy-csv".equals(name)) {
487: } else if ("bindy-fixed".equals(name)) {
489: } else if ("bindy-kvp".equals(name)) {
{code}
> Bindy dataformat documentation - three dataformats documented as one
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-16982
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16982
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: documentation
> Affects Versions: 3.x
> Reporter: Zoran Regvart
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Bindy dataformat is composed of three components which all (currently) have
> identical options. Our current documentation approach is to use single set of
> options for
> all three and with the `jsonpathTable2` macro we needed to pick one (see
> [PR#6096|https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/6096]).
> Should we split into three asciidoc files for each option - that would be in
> line with how other components are documented?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
