[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17565221#comment-17565221 ]
Matt Juntunen commented on CONFIGURATION-817: --------------------------------------------- > How do we feel about using some more advanced JUnit 5 functionality? IMHO, the examples given do not add to the readability of the tests so my vote is to leave them as-is. > Is it perhaps an idea to split this ticket into two? Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Plus, as you mention, others will be able to use JUnit 5 sooner rather than later. > Upgrade to JUnit 5 > ------------------ > > Key: CONFIGURATION-817 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-817 > Project: Commons Configuration > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build > Reporter: Rob Spoor > Priority: Minor > > From https://lists.apache.org/thread/ygtkpch0s7nss4vx8xfytwsbnv7mzss9 > {quote}Matt Juntunen - Monday, 4 July 2022 04:40:43 CEST > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.8.0 based on RC3 > Thanks, Bruno and Gary! > Gary, > I think the unit tests as a whole could use some upgrading. I'm > picturing a conversion to JUnit 5, during which we could ensure > compatibility with the latest JDK versions. I'm not sure what to do > about the javadoc warnings on the generated classes. From the comments > in the pom, this seems to have been an issue since v2.4. > Regards, > Matt J{quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)